**Title: The Hidden Agenda of Wealthy Elites: A Call to Action Against Conservative Policies****Word Count: 1,400**

**Title: The Hidden Agenda of Wealthy Elites: A Call to Action Against Conservative Policies**

**Word Count: 1,400**

The *Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.* Supreme Court decision in 4allowed Hobby Lobby to refuse to provide certain contraceptives under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) due to religious objections. This ruling marked a significant moment in the intersection of religious freedom and healthcare mandates. Conestoga Wood Specialties, another company involved in the same case, and Chick-fil-A, known for its public stance on conservative Christian values, have also been influential in shaping similar policies. These companies' actions align with the broader objectives of Project 2025, a strategic plan by conservative organizations aiming to reinforce traditional values, including religious freedom, in American governance and society.

Speculated and projected possible negative impacts on women, people of color, and the separation of church and state if this trend continues include:

**Women**: The refusal to cover contraceptives based on religious grounds directly impacts women's access to essential healthcare. Limiting access to birth control can lead to higher rates of unintended pregnancies, which can affect women's economic stability, educational opportunities, and overall health. Women, particularly those from low-income backgrounds, may struggle to afford out-of-pocket costs for contraceptives, leading to broader social and economic inequalities.

**People of Color**: Restrictions on healthcare access disproportionately affect people of color, who are more likely to face barriers to healthcare due to systemic inequalities. Reduced access to contraceptives and other reproductive health services exacerbates health disparities and limits opportunities for socio-economic advancement. These policies may reinforce existing inequalities and perpetuate cycles of poverty within marginalized communities.

**Separation of Church and State**: Allowing companies to opt out of federal mandates based on religious beliefs blurs the line between church and state. This trend can lead to the imposition of specific religious values on a diverse population, undermining the pluralistic foundation of American democracy. As more businesses and institutions claim religious exemptions, the precedence set by such cases could erode secular policies and legal protections designed to ensure equality and non-discrimination.

### Opinion Expansion

THE controlling power of very rich corporate, banking, political, military, police, healthcare, retail #racistfeudalists are using any and every wedge issue they can manufacture or enflame as a collective smokescreen to move behind the scenes and:

1. **Retain and extend their power by any means**: Wealthy and powerful entities are leveraging religious and moral issues to distract from their broader agenda of consolidating power. By focusing public attention on divisive social issues, they can implement policies and practices that strengthen their control over economic and political systems. This tactic diverts scrutiny away from their actions that may undermine democratic principles and increase inequality.

2. **Restrain, oppress, repress, and reprogram the demographic threatening their power**: The target demographic includes young people, women, people of color, progressives, and non-conservative university-educated individuals. These groups are often the most vocal in advocating for social justice, equality, and progressive reforms. By limiting their rights and access to resources, the ruling elite can weaken opposition and reduce the potential for collective action against their interests.

3. **Roll back the socioecoculturalpolitical system to effectively the late 19th-early 20th century**: The aim is to reestablish a social order reminiscent of a time when power was concentrated in the hands of a few, and minority groups had limited rights and opportunities. This involves dismantling progressive policies and protections that have been established over the past century. The veneer of a "Christian nation" is cultivated to justify these regressive measures, appealing to a segment of the population that supports traditional values.

**4. Muzzle grassroots opposition and pursue a fascist plutocracy**: By fostering a climate of division and fear, these powerful entities can suppress grassroots movements and dissent. The ultimate goal is to create a form of government that prioritizes the interests of the wealthy elite, characterized by authoritarianism and minimal checks on their power. The pursuit of global dominance, particularly through the recolonization of resources in Alkebulan (Africa), highlights the broader geopolitical strategy to control economic and political spheres globally. The USA and its UN allies are increasingly viewing the BRICA (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and Africa) nations as significant contenders in global power dynamics. The drive to control the world's resources and influence through recolonization efforts is part of a broader strategy to counter BRICA's rise and secure the USA's hegemony. This underscores a ruthless geopolitical competition that disregards the sovereignty and well-being of the affected regions.

### Devastating Impacts on Various Demographics

**People making under $200,000 in the USA**: These policies disproportionately impact those making under $200,000 annually, as they are less able to absorb increased healthcare costs. When corporations refuse to cover contraceptives and other health services, middle and lower-income families bear the financial burden. This can lead to increased financial stress, reduced savings, and limited access to necessary medical care, ultimately affecting their quality of life and economic mobility.

**Black people regardless of income**: Black communities face systemic healthcare disparities, and policies limiting access to reproductive health services exacerbate these issues. Regardless of income, Black individuals encounter higher rates of maternal mortality and morbidity. Restrictions on contraceptives and reproductive health care can lead to adverse health outcomes, reinforcing cycles of poverty and inequality, and limiting opportunities for social and economic advancement within Black communities.

**People of color, especially Latinos**: Latino communities, already facing significant barriers to healthcare access, are further marginalized by these policies. High uninsured rates and linguistic barriers compound the negative impact of restricted healthcare services. Without access to affordable contraceptives and reproductive health care, Latino families may experience higher rates of unintended pregnancies, leading to economic hardships and perpetuating health disparities within these communities.

**The youth**: Young people, particularly those in marginalized communities, are severely impacted by restricted access to reproductive health services. Lack of affordable contraceptives can lead to unintended pregnancies, disrupting educational and career goals. This creates long-term economic challenges and limits opportunities for upward mobility. The erosion of healthcare rights for young people undermines their ability to make informed decisions about their futures and well-being.

**Women of color and women**: Women of color face compounded discrimination in healthcare, and policies restricting access to reproductive services worsen these disparities. Women, in general, bear the brunt of these policies through increased healthcare costs and reduced access to essential services. This not only affects their physical health but also their socio-economic status, limiting their ability to achieve financial independence and career success.

**Young women of color (worst impacted)**: Young women of color are the most vulnerable to these regressive policies. They face systemic barriers in education, employment, and healthcare, and limited access to reproductive services further hinders their opportunities. Unintended pregnancies can derail educational pursuits and career aspirations, leading to long-term socio-economic disadvantages. The compounded impact of racial and gender discrimination in healthcare creates significant obstacles for young women of color, making it difficult for them to break free from cycles of poverty and inequality.

**Supporting Republicans and/or Conservatives in any way shape or form is utter ruin for the real people of the world**: The policies advocated by conservative and Republican leaders disproportionately harm marginalized communities, exacerbating inequalities and undermining democratic principles. The real people of the world—regardless of race, sex, religion, nationality, or income—suffer from the regressive and exclusionary policies that prioritize the interests of the wealthy elite over the rights and well-being of the broader population.

### Recommended Books

1. **"Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right" by Jane Mayer**: Jane Mayer is an investigative journalist who explores how wealthy individuals and corporations manipulate politics and policy in their favor.

2. **"Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America" by Nancy MacLean**: Nancy MacLean is a historian who examines the origins and impact of radical right-wing strategies to undermine democratic institutions.

3. **"The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" by Naomi Klein**: Naomi Klein is a social activist and author who investigates how powerful interests exploit crises to implement neoliberal policies that benefit the elite.

4. **"Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City" by Matthew Desmond**: Matthew Desmond is a sociologist who provides a detailed account of the eviction crisis in America, highlighting how economic inequality and housing policies disproportionately affect marginalized communities.

5. **"BRICS or Bust? Escaping the Middle-Income Trap" by Hartmut Elsenhans and Salvatore Babones**: Hartmut Elsenhans is a political scientist, and Salvatore Babones is a sociologist. Together, they explore the economic and political challenges faced by BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) as they navigate the complexities of escaping the middle-income trap and asserting their positions in the global economy.